{"id":5112,"date":"2024-10-21T16:57:24","date_gmt":"2024-10-21T14:57:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dhcab.com\/?p=5112"},"modified":"2024-10-21T16:57:24","modified_gmt":"2024-10-21T14:57:24","slug":"when-a-u-s-president-demanded-inspections-of-a-nuclear-facility-in-the-middle-east-and-failed-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dhcab.com\/?p=5112","title":{"rendered":"When a U.S. president demanded inspections of a nuclear facility in the Middle East (and failed)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

When a U.S. president demanded inspections of a nuclear facility in the Middle East (and failed)<\/p>\n

BY PHILIP WEISS JULY 27, 2015 51<\/p>\n

JOHN F. KENNEDY, 1917-1963<\/p>\n

In July 1963, President Kennedy demanded of the newly-elected Israeli Prime Minister that he allow U.S. inspections of the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona to make sure that the plant was \u201cdevoted exclusively to peaceful purposes.\u201d U.S. support for Israel would be \u201cseriously jeopardized\u201d if the U.S. could not get information on doings at the facility, Kennedy said.
Kennedy stated his demands in a letter to Levi Eshkol dated July 5, 1963, less than ten days after Eshkol became prime minister of Israel. The document is in the Israel State Archive, and is online at the National Security Archive, in a section titled Israel and the Bomb.
KENNEDY ESHKOL LETTER, PAGE 1<\/p>\n

KENNEDY-ESHKOL LETTER, PAGE 2 KENNEDY ESHKOL LETTER, PAGE 3
Text below (thanks in part to the Jewish Virtual Library).
Avner Cohen, author of Israel and the Bomb, writes at the National Security Archive:<\/p>\n

Not since President Eisenhower\u2019s message to [David] Ben Gurion, in the midst of the Suez crisis in November 1956, had an American president been so blunt with an Israeli prime minister. Kennedy told Eshkol that the American commitment and support of Israel \u2018could be seriously jeopardized\u2019 if Israel did not let the United States obtain \u2018reliable information\u2019 about Israel\u2019s efforts in the nuclear field. In the letter Kennedy presented specific demands on how the American inspection visits to Dimona should be executed. Since the United States had not been involved in the building of Dimona and no international law or agreement had been violated, Kennedy demands were indeed unprecedented. They amounted, in effect, to American ultimatum.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s the larger context?
In The Samson Option: Israel\u2019s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (1991), Seymour Hersh reports that Kennedy was dead-set against Israel getting the bomb and frequently pressured David Ben-Gurion, Eshkol\u2019s predecessor, to agree to inspections at Dimona. Kennedy even sold out his concerns about Palestinian refugees\u2019 return in order to gain concessions on Dimona\u2013 much to the consternation of the State Department. Hersh says that the Israelis misled American inspectors at the site, which had gone \u201ccritical\u201d in 1962 with the help of the French. And some members of Congress undercut Kennedy\u2019s policy in private communications with the Israelis.
Lyndon Johnson succeeded Kennedy as president on November 22, 1963, of course. He was also opposed to Israel getting the bomb, Hersh says. \u201cA nuclear Israel was unacceptable.\u201d But Johnson was in the end more accommodating: \u201cBy the middle 1960s, the game was fixed: President Johnson and his advisers would pretend that the American inspections amounted to proof that Israel was not building the bomb, leaving unblemished America\u2019s newly reaffirmed support for nuclear nonproliferation.\u201d
\u201cUnlike Kennedy, Johnson was not eager for a confrontation,\u201d Michael Karpin writes in The Bomb in the Basement. \u201cHe preferred compromise.\u201d Israel achieved nuclear capability in 1966, he says.
Both Karpin and Hersh attribute Johnson\u2019s winking acceptance of Israel into the nuclear club to his sensitivity to the Jewish experience in the Holocaust and the effect of what both men call \u201cthe Jewish lobby.\u201d Hersh mentions Johnson\u2019s dependence on financial contributions from Abraham Feinberg.
Here is that Kennedy letter:<\/p>\n

\u201cDear Mr. Prime Minister:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.
\u201cYou are aware, I am sure, of the exchanges which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits to Israel\u2019s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister\u2019s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel\u2019s willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.
\u201cI regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion\u2019s May 27 letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.
\u201cI am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote to Mr. Ben-Gurion, this government\u2019s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to peace as the question of Israel\u2019s effort in the nuclear field.
\u201cTherefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel\u2019s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion\u2019s letter was in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.
\u201cKnowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.
\u201cSincerely,
\u201cJohn F. Kennedy\u201d<\/p>\n

It looks as if Pollard\u2019s release is imminent.
Jonathan Pollard, the U.S. intelligence analyst who spied for Israel and was sentenced to life in prison, could be released as early as November when he becomes eligible for mandatory parole, according to the Justice Department. His release would eliminate a long-standing wedge in U.S.-Israel relations at a time of increased tensions between the countries over a nuclear deal with Iran.
The Justice Department said Friday that although Pollard was ordered to serve life in prison after being convicted of selling U.S. secrets to the Israeli government, the terms of his sentence require that he be released after 30 years \u2014 a date that will arrive this fall \u2014 unless the government can prove that he violated rules in prison or is likely to commit additional crimes.
In a statement, the Justice Department signaled that the government was not planning to oppose the release, noting that Pollard is \u201cpresumptively eligible for mandatory parole.\u201d<\/p>\n

If he is released, and he is then lionized when he gets to Israel, I think that will further discredit Israel in the eyes of Americans.<\/p>\n

There are a number of us who believe that JFK was killed because of his opposition to Israeli nukes. LBJ was complicit, with key figures in the CIA and Mossad. JFK also wanted AIPAC to register as a foreign lobby. All of this got overturned when LBJ took power. Jewish money had a lot to do with it, as it did with the creation of Israel<\/p>\n

RE: \u201cWhen a U.S. president demanded inspections of a nuclear facility in the Middle East (and failed)\u201d
SEE: \u201cHow Israel Out-Foxed US Presidents\u201d, By Morgan Strong (A Special Report), ConsortiumNews.com, 5\/31\/10<\/p>\n

[EXCERPT] \u25cf Secret Nukes and JFK
. . . Even as it backed down in the Sinai [following its invasion in 1956], Israel was involved in another monumental deception, a plan for building its own nuclear arsenal.
In 1956, Israel had concluded an agreement with France to build a nuclear reactor in the Negev desert. Israel also signed a secret agreement with France to build an adjacent plutonium reprocessing plant.
Israel began constructing its nuclear plant in 1958. However, French President Charles de Gaulle was worried about nuclear weapons destabilizing the Middle East and insisted that Israel not develop a nuclear bomb from the plutonium processing plant. Prime Minister Ben-Gurion assured de Gaulle that the processing plant was for peaceful purposes only.
After John F. Kennedy became President, he also wrote to Ben-Gurion explicitly calling on Israel not to join the nuclear-weapons club, drawing another pledge from Ben-Gurion that Israel had no such intention.
Nevertheless, Kennedy continued to press, forcing the Israelis to let U.S. scientists inspect the nuclear reactor at Dimona. But the Israelis first built a fake control room while bricking up and otherwise disguising parts of the building that housed the plutonium processing plant.
In return for allowing inspectors into Dimona, Ben-Gurion also demanded that the United States sell Hawk surface-to-air missiles to the Israeli military. Kennedy agreed to the sale as a show of good faith.
Subsequently, however, the CIA got wind of the Dimona deception and leaked to the press that Israel was secretly building a nuclear bomb.
After Kennedy\u2019s assassination, President Lyndon Johnson also grew concerned over Israel\u2019s acquiring nuclear weapons. He asked then-Prime Minister Levi Eshkol to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Eshkol assured Johnson that Israel was studying the matter and would sign the treaty in due course. However, Israel has never signed the treaty and never has admitted that it developed nuclear weapons. [For details, See \u201cIsrael and The Bomb\u201d by Avner Cohen.] .<\/div>\n<\/div>\n